A 20-year-old woman presents with a 2-week history of fever, malaise, and brown-colored urine. She recently visited Mexico. Physical examination reveals jaundice, mild hepatomegaly, and tenderness in the right upper quadrant. The serum bilirubin is 7.8 mg/dL, with 60% in the conjugated form. Serum levels of AST and ALT are markedly elevated (400 and 392 U/L, respectively). Serum albumin and immunoglobulin levels are normal. Serum IgM anti-hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) is positive. IgG anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBsAg) antibodies are positive. Anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies are negative.What is the most likely diagnosis?
A 20-year-old woman presents with a 2-week history of fever, malaise, and brown-colored urine. She recently visited Mexico. Physical examination reveals jaundice, mild hepatomegaly, and tenderness in the right upper quadrant. The serum bilirubin is 7.8 mg/dL, with 60% in the conjugated form. Serum levels of AST and ALT are markedly elevated (400 and 392 U/L, respectively). Serum albumin and immunoglobulin levels are normal. Serum IgM anti-hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) is positive. IgG anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBsAg) antibodies are positive. Anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies are negative.What is the most likely diagnosis?
💡 Explanation
## **Core Concept**
The patient's presentation suggests acute hepatitis, given the symptoms of fever, malaise, jaundice, and abnormal liver function tests (elevated bilirubin, AST, and ALT). The diagnosis of acute hepatitis involves identifying the causative agent, commonly viruses such as hepatitis A, B, and C.
## **Why the Correct Answer is Right**
The patient presents with acute hepatitis symptoms and has a positive **IgM anti-hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV)**, which indicates a recent infection with hepatitis A virus (HAV). Hepatitis A infection is typically self-limiting and does not progress to chronicity. The presence of **IgG anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBsAg) antibodies** suggests immunity to hepatitis B, either through vaccination or past infection. The negative **anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies** makes hepatitis C less likely. Given these serological markers, the most likely diagnosis is **acute hepatitis A infection**.
## **Why Each Wrong Option is Incorrect**
- **Option A:** Without specific details on the option, we cannot directly address its incorrectness, but any option not supported by the serological evidence provided would be incorrect.
- **Option B:** Similarly, without specifics, any option not aligning with the patient's presentation and lab findings (e.g., suggesting chronic hepatitis B or C based on the provided negative and positive results) would be incorrect.
- **Option C:** This option would be incorrect if it suggested a diagnosis not supported by the acute presentation and specific serological markers provided (e.g., chronic liver disease).
- **Option D:** This would be incorrect if it did not align with the evidence pointing towards an acute HAV infection.
## **Clinical Pearl / High-Yield Fact**
A key point to remember is that **IgM antibodies** are indicative of acute infection, whereas **IgG antibodies** suggest past infection or immunity. Specifically, **IgM anti-HAV** is a marker for acute hepatitis A, and its presence confirms the diagnosis in the appropriate clinical context.
## **Correct Answer:** D. Acute Hepatitis A infection.
✓ Correct Answer: A. Acute viral hepatitis A
📤 Share this MCQ
Share Card Preview
👆 1080x1080 square card — fills the full width in WhatsApp and Telegram