A 28-year-old G1, PO 26-wk pregnant woman is seen in the OB clinic. She has a past history of bronchial asthma that has been well controlled for the last year by inhaled steroids. She states that she has noted increasing shoness of breath for the last 3 days. On examination, she appears tachypneic and moderately uncomfoable. On physical examination, she has a pulse of 110 bpm; normal temperature; respirations 32/min; blood pressure 160/90 mm Hg. Hea exam: NSR without any gallop. A grade 2/6 systolic murmur in the pulmonic area is heard. Lung exam is clear to auscultation; abdomen exam confirms a 26-wk gravid uterus. Laboratory data: Hb 12 g/dL; Hct 36%; WBCs 7.0/uL with normal differential; BUN 23 mg/dL; creatinine 0.9 mg/dL; sodium 136 mEq/L; potassium 4.2 mEq/l. ABGs on room air: pH 7.34; PCO2 34 mm Hg; PO2 68 mm Hg. PEFR 450 L/min. Chest x-rays are shown.The most likely diagnosis is
A 28-year-old G1, PO 26-wk pregnant woman is seen in the OB clinic. She has a past history of bronchial asthma that has been well controlled for the last year by inhaled steroids. She states that she has noted increasing shoness of breath for the last 3 days. On examination, she appears tachypneic and moderately uncomfoable. On physical examination, she has a pulse of 110 bpm; normal temperature; respirations 32/min; blood pressure 160/90 mm Hg. Hea exam: NSR without any gallop. A grade 2/6 systolic murmur in the pulmonic area is heard. Lung exam is clear to auscultation; abdomen exam confirms a 26-wk gravid uterus. Laboratory data: Hb 12 g/dL; Hct 36%; WBCs 7.0/uL with normal differential; BUN 23 mg/dL; creatinine 0.9 mg/dL; sodium 136 mEq/L; potassium 4.2 mEq/l. ABGs on room air: pH 7.34; PCO2 34 mm Hg; PO2 68 mm Hg. PEFR 450 L/min. Chest x-rays are shown.The most likely diagnosis is
π‘ Explanation
**Core Concept**
The underlying principle being tested is the diagnosis of respiratory complications in pregnancy, specifically differentiating between asthma exacerbation and other potential causes of shortness of breath. **Pulmonary embolism (PE)** and **asthma** are two key considerations in this scenario, given the patient's history and presentation.
**Why the Correct Answer is Right**
Given the patient's symptoms of shortness of breath, tachypnea, and the absence of wheezing or other signs of asthma exacerbation, along with the chest x-ray findings (not described but implied to be relevant), the most likely diagnosis would be **pulmonary embolism (PE)**. The patient's **hypoxemia (low PO2)**, **tachypnea**, and **tachycardia** are consistent with PE, especially in the context of pregnancy, which increases the risk of venous thromboembolism.
**Why Each Wrong Option is Incorrect**
**Option A:** Would be incorrect if it suggested an asthma exacerbation, as the lung exam is clear, and the PEFR is relatively preserved.
**Option B:** Might be incorrect if it proposed a cardiac issue, as the heart exam does not indicate significant dysfunction or signs suggestive of heart failure.
**Option C:** Could be incorrect if it implied another diagnosis not supported by the clinical presentation or laboratory findings.
**Option D:** Would be incorrect if it suggested a diagnosis that does not align with the patient's symptoms and test results.
**Clinical Pearl / High-Yield Fact**
Pregnancy increases the risk of **venous thromboembolism**, including **pulmonary embolism**, due to hypercoagulability, venous stasis, and vascular wall injury. Thus, any pregnant patient presenting with acute onset of shortness of breath and tachypnea should prompt consideration of PE.
**Correct Answer:** D. Pulmonary Embolism
β Correct Answer: B. Pulmonary embolism
π€ Share this MCQ
Share Card Preview
π 1080x1080 square card β fills the full width in WhatsApp and Telegram