First, the core concept here is about statistical tests for categorical data. Both variables are binary: iron supplements (yes/no) and low birth weight (yes/no). So, we need a test that handles two categorical variables. The chi-square test is designed for this scenario, comparing observed frequencies to expected if there's no association.
Why chi-square? Because it's used for contingency tables, like a 2x2 table here. The test checks if the distribution of one variable is independent of the other. If the p-value is significant, it suggests an association between the variables.
Now, the wrong options. Let's think about possible distractors. Maybe options include t-test, ANOVA, or Fisher's exact test. A t-test is for comparing means between two groups, which isn't the case here. ANOVA is for more than two groups. Fisher's exact test is also for categorical data but is used when sample sizes are small. Since the sample size here is 100, chi-square is appropriate unless there are expected counts less than 5 in any cell, which might require Fisher's. But the question doesn't mention that, so chi-square is the default.
Clinical pearl: Remember that chi-square is for categorical variables in a contingency table. For small samples (n < 20), Fisher's exact test is better. For continuous data, use t-test or ANOVA. Also, if the data is matched (like paired samples), McNemar's test would be used instead. So the correct answer should be the chi-square test. Let me structure the explanation accordingly.
**Core Concept**
This question assesses statistical methods for analyzing the association between two **binary categorical variables** (iron supplement use and low birth weight). The appropriate test must evaluate independence in a **2x2 contingency table** using **frequency counts**.
**Why the Correct Answer is Right**
The **chi-square test of independence** is designed to determine if there's a statistically significant association between two categorical variables. Here, the data forms a 2x2 table (iron use: yes/no; low birth weight: yes/no). The test compares observed frequencies to expected frequencies under the null hypothesis of no association. It is valid when all expected cell counts are ≥5, which is likely with 100 participants unless severely imbalanced.
**Why Each Wrong Option is Incorrect**
**Option A:** *T-test* is for comparing **continuous** outcomes (e.g., mean birth weights) between two groups, not binary outcomes.
**Option B:** *ANOVA* is for comparing **continuous** outcomes across **more than two groups**, which does not apply here.
**Option D:** *Fisher’s exact test* is used for small sample sizes (typically <20) or when expected cell counts <5, which is not indicated here.
**Clinical Pearl / High-Yield Fact**
Remember: **Chi-square** for **2x2 tables** with **adequate sample size**; **Fisher’s exact** for **small samples**. Always check expected cell counts (≥5) before choosing chi-square. For **paired binary
Free Medical MCQs · NEET PG · USMLE · AIIMS
Access thousands of free MCQs, ebooks and daily exams.
By signing in you agree to our Privacy Policy.