**Core Concept**
The scenario involves a conflict between the public health imperative to vaccinate against a contagious disease and an individual's right to autonomy and informed consent. In such cases, medical professionals must balance individual rights with the need to protect public health.

**Why the Correct Answer is Right**
In the context of infectious disease outbreaks, public health laws often grant authorities the power to implement vaccination mandates. This is based on the principle of "emergency exception" to informed consent, where the need to protect public health takes precedence over individual autonomy. Vaccination is a proven effective measure to prevent the spread of infectious diseases, and mandatory vaccination can be a crucial tool in controlling outbreaks. The correct answer is based on the understanding that, in situations of public health emergency, vaccination can be legally mandated without individual consent.

**Why Each Wrong Option is Incorrect**
**Option A:** This option is incorrect because it prioritizes individual autonomy over public health, which may not be the most effective approach in controlling an infectious disease outbreak.
**Option B:** This option is incorrect because it involves coercive measures that may not be necessary or effective in controlling the outbreak, and may also be legally problematic.
**Option C:** This option is incorrect because it involves a breach of medical ethics and the principle of informed consent, which is essential in medical practice.

**Clinical Pearl / High-Yield Fact**
In situations of public health emergencies, medical professionals should be aware of the relevant laws and regulations governing vaccination mandates, and ensure that they are implemented in a fair and transparent manner.

**Correct Answer: C. Mandate vaccination, citing public health emergency and emergency exception to informed consent.